*MAFIA* Forums
Miscellaneous => Spam => Topic started by: *MAFIA* Bonehead on August 09, 2006, 02:22:41 PM
-
What is the answer today?
Answer: The bus never moved, kmh not kmph :p
Answer:
-
It's going 31.06 mph because at the end it speeds up to that amount. Duh.... ;P
It's going 31.06 mph because at the end it speeds up to that amount. Duh.... ;P
which is about 49.69 Kph
God we're smart......
Haha, you guys are wrong,
It all depends on how long the bus was accually driving at these speeds, if you don't have this info, you can't know what the average speed has been untill now!!
Haha, you guys are wrong,
It all depends on how long the bus was accually driving at these speeds, if you don't have this info, you can't know what the average speed has been untill now!! ;)
There is nothing in the question about the average speed of the bus. The answer is as stated above 31.06mph
There is nothing in the question about the average speed of the bus. The answer is as stated above 31.06mph
Oh, silly me. But it does say, how fast the bus is REALLY going. So I thought something else was ment then what is displayed on the busses speedOmeter.
Nice try guys but no one has it :)
haha retards i get it, u cant speed up from 80kmh to 30mph
80kmh is equal to 50mph
i think the bus is actually going backwards... wtf im so confused lol
you are close gio but no dice :)
you are close gio but no dice :)
is the bus not moving?
you are close gio but no dice :)
Are you talking to Chris? I get confused too when I see him post because he has a picture of Gio in his avatar. Anyway, I'm not taking a guess at the answer yet until I actually think about it.
i think the bus is actually going backwards... wtf im so confused lol
Ha, I hope it is, that'd be hilarious.
-
You have to assume that half of all mexicans are pregnant so that leaves you with fifteen pregnant mexicans crossing the border. Then you take the figures of fifteen minus four that drowned, minus two that got shot, minus six that were lost and minus three that starved to death and that leaves you zero so no pregnant mexicans survived?
-
that's sounds about right.
-
but the mexicans that died didn't necessarily have to be the pregnant ones...
-
Well what if 1 or more of the pregnant mexicans had twins? haha
-
Then you take the figures of fifteen minus four that drowned, minus two that got shot, minus six that were lost and minus three that starved to death and that leaves you zero so no pregnant mexicans survived?
Wouldn't you only be subtracting two that drowned (in addition killing their two babies), one that was shot (killing her baby; here we assume a mortal wound), three that were lost (three more lost babies), and one that starved to death (plus her baby and an additional to make three).
Now, that would be 15 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 1 = 8. However, the three that were lost should not be subtracted because they survived (though remain lost). So, we're back up to 11.
Notice that the child which dies leaves a mother, though alive enough, no longer pregnant, so we must account for this.
Finally, we reach 10 surviving, albeit slightly misplaced, pregnant Mexicans.
-
Wouldn't you only be subtracting two that drowned (in addition killing their two babies), one that was shot (killing her baby; here we assume a mortal wound), three that were lost (three more lost babies), and one that starved to death (plus her baby and an additional to make three).
Now, that would be 15 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 1 = 8. However, the three that were lost should not be subtracted because they survived (though remain lost). So, we're back up to 11.
Notice that the child which dies leaves a mother, though alive enough, no longer pregnant, so we must account for this.
Finally, we reach 10 surviving, albeit slightly misplaced, pregnant Mexicans.
wow, that was deep brother.
-
Wouldn't you only be subtracting two that drowned (in addition killing their two babies), one that was shot (killing her baby; here we assume a mortal wound), three that were lost (three more lost babies), and one that starved to death (plus her baby and an additional to make three).
Now, that would be 15 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 1 = 8. However, the three that were lost should not be subtracted because they survived (though remain lost). So, we're back up to 11.
Notice that the child which dies leaves a mother, though alive enough, no longer pregnant, so we must account for this.
Finally, we reach 10 surviving, albeit slightly misplaced, pregnant Mexicans.
Numbers scare me...
-
Wouldn't you only be subtracting two that drowned (in addition killing their two babies), one that was shot (killing her baby; here we assume a mortal wound), three that were lost (three more lost babies), and one that starved to death (plus her baby and an additional to make three).
Now, that would be 15 - 2 - 1 - 3 - 1 = 8. However, the three that were lost should not be subtracted because they survived (though remain lost). So, we're back up to 11.
Notice that the child which dies leaves a mother, though alive enough, no longer pregnant, so we must account for this.
Finally, we reach 10 surviving, albeit slightly misplaced, pregnant Mexicans.
ok i got lost somewhere.
-
There's not enough information.
-
Numbers scare me...
Numbers invited me to a potluck dinner.
-
Numbers invited me to a potluck dinner.
Did you bring green beans or cole slaw this time?
-
I like our get togethers :) pig, skunk, coon, possum, rattlesnake, beer, more beer, guns, trucks.
-
Are we ever going to get the QOTD back?
-
That would be awesome if you did. That might brighten this place up again. :)
-
That would be awesome if you did. That might brighten this place up again. :)
its always bright in here with you around havok ;)