*MAFIA* Forums

Miscellaneous => Spam => Topic started by: DeAtH on April 07, 2008, 01:20:29 PM

Title: Neat site, is it bull?
Post by: DeAtH on April 07, 2008, 01:20:29 PM
http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/referrer/srtest


i passed 2142 better than battlefield 2 but i lagged like hell wen i tried to play bf2.

Can anyone tell if its bull
Title: Re: Neat site, is it bull?
Post by: Loaded on April 07, 2008, 03:26:20 PM
I have seen the site and tried it, IMO, it isn't bull but there is so much that makes a difference when running a game... It is more then hardware. Now maybe if you shut down EVERYTHING in your task manager it will be close to to being right.

What you did is the only way to be sure, try the game and see how it runs.

I would have to assume that site is checking the minimum of the game (that the company says is the min) to say yes or no. In other words, if EA says you can run BF2 on P-III, 156 or ram and on a ATI 8500 video card at minimum then the site will give you a "Go" for the game. But think about it, would you want to run any game on minimum spec? I know I wouldn't.
Title: Re: Neat site, is it bull?
Post by: DeAtH on April 07, 2008, 04:29:18 PM
i didn't really post it about my bf problem idc really about that, i know what you mean though, i think its neat tho to see which games are which results and that i had better results for a newer game...can your computer handle crysis loaded?
Title: Re: Neat site, is it bull?
Post by: Loaded on April 07, 2008, 05:47:18 PM
This is what I got on the Crysis test.

(http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/media/srl/graph_all_4.gif)

BUT with changing the code for that test result I get this...

(http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/media/srl/graph_all_1.gif)

or this...

(http://www.systemrequirementslab.com/media/srl/graph_all_8.gif)

Point... Don't let anyone BS you if they show you this type of pic, the code can be changed to make it what ever you want  ;)