...when in a debate, spelling and punctuation are important as a way of showing your level of profession.
Well my level of profession is a school teacher, and part of that profession is correcting language mistakes (spelling, capitalizion, puncuation, grammar).
SINCE you had to point out ThaSnyper's, I only thought it'd be fair that I point out a few of yours.......
I'm speaking to those who relay information, such as (1)yourself Snyper. You're like a French soldier in WWI. (2) Practically a sheep in the heard. Your general tells you to jump up into no man's land, and run (3)towards the enemy attempting attrition, and you say "ok."...If the government told you to jump, you'd say (4)"how high".
(1)"you" (2) not a sentence (3) "toward" (4)"how high
."Nope... it makes SENSE. Since is usually an association with a distance (5)from (since)... a point in time.
(5)"form"
The only way you can find facts out (6)are by asking questions.
(6)"is"
So, (7)congrats, thanks for proving to me that the general conspirator is an educated person who has solid evidence because of their education, allowing them to make a clean ( arguement.
(7) "congratulation
s" (
"argument"
The fact that one of your (9) arguements against me, is my age, is (10)rediculous. I'm one of the only (11)16 year old kids who even looks into politics. The (12)age of "conspirators" tend to be in (13)there 20's and up, and the education level as higher college graduates.
(9)"arguments" (10)"ridiculous" (11)"16-year-old" -(12)"ages" (13)"their"
Who is (14)argueing for your side? Many of those who don't support (15)conspiratorist theories and argue against it have a lower education. Many of them(16), went straight to the military after highschool, probably not able to get a (17)damn good education in college. The people who run your (18)arguement(19), are the ones (19)who you should be questioning the validity (20)of.
(14)"arguing" (15)"conspirators'" (16)not needed (17)"damn" = not proper debate language (18)"argument" (19)not needed (20)not correct to end a sentence with a preposition
My friends who (21)bitch about their parents not letting them stay out past 1:00 in the morning... (22)there thoughts will change. They'll have kids, and then they'll think of the safety they want for them, and do the same as their parents did, despite (23)there feelings of when they were taught. At least I acknowledge it.
(21)"bitch" = not proper debate language (22) & (23)"their"
(24)Hell, show me body parts from Shanksville, considering the fact that the (25)corener had nothing to inspect... (26)Congrats! There's wreckage! Then why the (27)hell did they tell us that BOTH planes were incinerated upon impact? (28)When we can clearly see that there is wreckage to be examined.
(24) & (27)"hell" = not proper debate language (25)"coroner" (26)"congratulation
s" (28)not a sentence
There might be some more, those are just the ones I noticed. I know I'm not perfect either, we all make mistakes, but when you point out someone else's, be prepared to take it back.
By the way, I am not taking sides on this political debate/issue/argument, whatever you want to call it, but I do find it interesting...